Current:Home > NewsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -EliteFunds
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-16 13:36:19
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (469)
Related
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- 7.2-magnitude earthquake recorded in Alaska, triggering brief tsunami warning
- Dear Life Kit: Do I have to listen to my boss complain?
- Soft Corals Are Dying Around Jeju Island, a Biosphere Reserve That’s Home to a South Korean Navy Base
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- 39 Products To Make the Outdoors Enjoyable if You’re an Indoor Person
- Consumer advocates want the DOJ to move against JetBlue-Spirit merger
- How Much Did Ancient Land-Clearing Fires in New Zealand Affect the Climate?
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- ExxonMobil Shareholders to Company: We Want a Different Approach to Climate Change
Ranking
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Is Project Texas enough to save TikTok?
- Transcript: Kara Swisher, Pivot co-host, on Face the Nation, July 16, 2023
- Buttigieg calls for stronger railroad safety rules after East Palestine disaster
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Girlfriend Collective's Massive Annual Sale Is Here: Shop Sporty Chic Summer Essentials for Up to 50% Off
- Disgraced FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried has another big problem: He won't shut up
- Tesla has a new master plan. It's not a new car — just big thoughts on planet Earth
Recommendation
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
How to file your tax returns: 6 things you should know this year
Cardi B Is an Emotional Proud Mommy as Her and Offset's Daughter Kulture Graduates Pre-K
Titanic Sub Catastrophe: Passenger’s Sister Says She Would Not Have Gone on Board
'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
39 Products To Make the Outdoors Enjoyable if You’re an Indoor Person
Julie Su, advocate for immigrant workers, is Biden's pick for Labor Secretary
Warming Trends: The BBC Introduces ‘Life at 50 Degrees,’ Helping African Farmers Resist Drought and Driftwood Provides Clues to Climate’s Past